The court case of American For Safe Access vs. the DEA on its justification of Cannabis classification as scheduled # 1 the most dangerous with no medical benefits will have to prove this in spite of thousands of years of safe effective and scientific facts. This putting into redundancy over 70% of its mission. October 16th 9:00 AM Washington DC. Will the candidates admit the truth?

When will you stop bombing Afghan weddin parties with drones? When will you close Guantanamo and give it back to Cuba? When will you debate Jill Stein?

In attempting to reduce the deficit:

Will Foreign Aid be cut? If not, why not? If so, how much? Will all countries be equally cut?

Will overseas US military bases be closed? If not why not? If so, which ones, and when?

Thank you.

President Obama: Why do you have a fake Connecticut social security number?

I would like to ask Mr. Romney why he things a teacher, policeman, fireman, or plumber should pay a higher tax rate than him simply because their income comes from salary or hourly wages and his comes from Capital Gains. It seems to me that all income should be taxed at the same rate.

Correction, the word things in the previous post should read thinks

Ask the Congress. They passed the laws. Not Romney.

Yes they did and Mr. Romney favors maintaining low Capital Gains taxes if not lowering them further. I consider this inequitable. The standard argument for maintaining low Capital gains taxes is if they would rise money would be taken out of the economy. Seriously, where would they put it, under their mattress!

I would like to ask Governor Romney why he paid more taxes than required in 2011 and would he encourage others to not take full advantage of the tax code (or just those running for president)?

Also, after the last debate, in which Governor Romney seemed to assert that the rich will not be getting a tax cut after all under his proposals (as presumably all the deductions reform will take care of any tax rate cut), I would like him to walk me through an example of a high earner and show me how his 2013 real tax rate would compare with the 2011 real tax rate, under Mr. Romney’s proposal. Oh, and if you need a real life example, let’s use Mr. Romney’s 2011 tax returns (that he has already disclosed).

In other words, will Governor Romney indeed not get a tax cut under his proposal.

LOL Call Ryan's office and they will send you a copy of the President's birth certificate.

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/10/paul_ryan_obama_birthers.php

Even he realizes the Birthers are full of crap.

The birth certificate has nothing to do with his social security number.

Let's ask the President why he ignored pleas for help and let four people go to their death because of his incompetency. Here are Obama's bumps in the road pleading for assistance:
The former head of a Special Forces “Site Security Team” in Libya tells CBS News that in spite of multiple pleas from himself and other U.S. security officials on the ground for “more, not less” security personnel, the State Department removed as many as 34 people from the country in the six months before a terrorist attack in Benghazi that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others.

Lt. Col. Andy Wood will appear this week at a House Oversight Committee hearing that will examine security decisions leading up to the Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi.

Speaking to CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson, Wood said when he found out that his own 16-member team and a six-member State Department elite force were being pulled from Tripoli in August – about a month before the assault in Benghazi – he felt, “like we were being asked to play the piano with two fingers. There was concern amongst the entire embassy staff.”

Read more: http://patriotupdate.com/30634/ambassador-made-multiple-pleas-for-more-security#ixzz28j4s40h3

LOL "Patriot Update"

Here it is straight from CBS news:

Despite two explosions and dozens of other security threats, U.S. officials in Washington turned down repeated pleas from American diplomats in Libya to increase security at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi where the U.S. ambassador was killed, Republican leaders of a House committee said Tuesday.

In a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Chairman Darrell Issa and Rep. Jason Chaffetz of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee said their information came from "individuals with direct knowledge of events in Libya."

Issa, R-Calif., and Chaffetz, R-Utah, said the attack three weeks ago in Benghazi that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans was the latest in a long line of attacks on Western diplomats and officials in Libya in the months before the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terror attacks on the U.S.

There was allegedly even a direct threat on Facebook, the Daily Beast reports. In June, militants associated with the late dictator Muammar Qaddafi allegedly posted a threat referencing Amassador Stevens' jogging route, even posting a picture of him.

Intense questioning over the White House's handling of the situation in Libya has gained a lot of traction in Republican circles recently,

On Sunday on "Face the Nation", former House Speaker Newt Gingrich suggested the ambassador was without security on 9/11, and that was a terrible mistake.

As usual the liberals on this web site could care less about 4 Americans being brutally murdered. They are more concerned that people get their news from sources other than MSNBC and CNN.

My wife was born in Germany and I was born in England both our parent were in the Army and we both cant be president, we our both US citizens I we hypothetically should be allowed and I don't see any problem with Obama's citizen either.

Bill and Frank, While we appreciate your interactivity on the site, we hope you'll allow room for folks who want to offer questions for the "citizen's debate."

I would like Ryan to be asked directly about why he wants to outlaw IVF procedures. Biden should tell stories of a few of the millions of couples struggling to conceive whose option of last resort is in vitro fertilisation (IVF). It is expensive, painful, and doesn't even guarantee a pregnancy, but it is an important option to have for so many people who suffer in this way.

His stance on this issue is so extreme, uncaring, and misguided that I can't understand how people are taking him seriously as a potential vice president. He should be disqualified for wanting to make an important medical procedure illegal.

This should get more press, since 10-15% of couples in the US suffer from infertility. People need to hear that he wants to take away their medical options. http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/infertility/DS00310

I would like to hear Mr. Romney's explanation for his sudden shift toward the center on so many issues in the first debate? You have never appeared to care for the middle class. Why should we believe you now?

President Obama: What will you tell the Olive Garden workers who were cut to part time jobs because Olive Garden can't afford to pay your Obamacare tax. The number of cuts will be over 10,000 now and soon to grow to other restaurant chains. How about a straight answer?

Do either of you believe that a 33% cut in the Social Security payroll tax, at a time the Trust Fund is bleeding dry, is wise public policy?

Question for Gov (Mr.) Romney:
I would like to know since your viewpoint or stance on policy and topics (education, abortion, taxes, Social Security, Medicare, etc.) has changed according to which polls rate the highest, what and how will you consider keeping your word on the very topics you did not agree with in the beginning phase of your campaign? More importantly, what policy should we most believe you to stand firm on?

Question for both candidates. In general terms, Republicans want to fix the economy by easing tax burdens so the money gets into the hands of the people, especially the rich and the small business owners, so it can be spent and used to hire folks. Democrats want to fix the economy by increasing taxes so the government can spend the money and hire people. Same result -- more money being circulated and more people working means a stronger economy and more income for the government. Without using the phrases "We've tried that" or "It doesn't work", explain (using small words so its easy to understand) why there is so much national anger over this issue? Aren't both sides making an honest effort to fix the problem using the best advice of economic experts? Isn't this simply a disagreement over the best way to use that combined wealth where Dems say bring it all together into a giant pool of cash and Repubs say spread it out and let it work.