New Process, Same Result for Rock Creek Hills
The site-selection committee for the new Bethesda-Chevy Chase cluster middle school chose Rock Creek Hills Park over North Chevy Chase Park as the committee's recommended location for the new school, should the school be built on public land.
The soccer fields of Rock Creek Hills Park just might end up being the ground that gives when it comes time to build the Bethesda-Chevy Chase cluster’s new middle school, scheduled to open in 2017.
At a site-selection committee meeting on Wednesday night, the committee voted overwhelmingly in favor of recommending that the new school be built at Rock Creek Hills Park, rather than at North Chevy Chase Park, if the school is to be built on publicly owned land.
Last year, the Montgomery County Board of Education voted to move forward with a feasibility study for the school at the same park, and designs for the school were already underway when Superintendent Joshua Starr called for a re-do of the site-selection process, citing the need for more transparency.
Three other sites—all privately owned—are still under consideration for the new middle school, but their locations have not yet been disclosed, in order to preserve the ability of Montgomery County Public Schools to negotiate a purchase price should one of them be chosen.
Before the vote on Wednesday, residents took turns behind the microphone stating reasons why the planned school should not be located in one or the other—or, in some cases, either—of the parks.
For starters, the hilly topography of Rock Creek Hills Park would make the park a more expensive site to build on, said John Robinson, president of the Rock Creek Hills Citizens’ Association.
And, with many local residents using Rock Creek Hills Park for recreational purposes, the park is “probably one of the most valuable parks” in Montgomery County, local resident John Saber told Patch.
Many residents commented on the fact that siting a school in Rock Creek Hills Park—on the eastern end of the cluster in Kensington—could result in a less-diverse student body both at the new school and at Westland Middle School, which is currently the only middle school in the Bethesda-Chevy Chase cluster.
Siting the new school closer to the center of the cluster would ensure that its students would be of more diverse backgrounds, they added.
Residents near North Chevy Chase Park—on Jones Bridge Road in Chevy Chase—spoke out against the construction of a new middle school in their neighborhood, noting concerns about traffic congestion near the intersection of Connecticut Avenue and Jones Bridge Road, and about siting a school near the National Institutes of Health, which one resident described as a “potential terrorist site.”
Other residents strongly urged the site-selection committee to recommend neither of the public parks, and to recommend the purchase of a private site instead, so that public land need not be lost.
Many even boo-ed when site-selection committee member Laurie Rosen, representing the Westland Middle School PTA, suggested that building a school on a public park could be thought of as “taking one public good and replacing it with another public good,” and that the school could become a "great community gathering (place)."
When it came time for the final vote on which public park to recommend over the other, the issue of transparency—which has plagued the site-selection committee throughout the process—was raised by site-selection committee member Ken Strickland of the Chevy Chase Valley Citizens association.
But, the idea of non-anonymous voting was not well-received by most committee members, particularly since the rules governing the committee do not call for it, pointed out committee member Bill Farley of the Town of Somerset.
Committee members voted with secret ballots.
Rock Creek Hills Park is the former site of the now-closed Kensington Junior High School. After that school was shuttered, the park was transferred to the Park and Planning Commission with the caveat that MCPS could reclaim the site if ever it needed space for a school in the area, Patch reported last fall.
Fritz Hirst
2:25 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
It was a very thorough process and a resounding vote by the committee.
Tom
5:14 pm on Thursday, March 15, 2012
Let's see...the facilitator was boxed out after meeting one. The criteria weren't weighted, making it impossible to conduct a consistent comparison sites. The costs associated with the replacement of facilities weren't considered. The cost of tree replacement wasn't assessed. The suitability of road infrastructure wasn't evaluated consistently. The construction costs associated with topology weren't compared. The Planning Board documents regarding the site and surrounding community weren't even presented, notwithstanding the fact that they are referenced in the transfer agreement. And that's for starters. That decision is anything but thorough. It's arbitrary, unsubstantiated, and litigation bait, as evidenced by Rock Creek Hills' minority report and by the reports of the county planning officials that participated in the meetings.
Jessica
2:44 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
The other caveat was that 9 acres of this school was given to the Kensington Nursing home, another greater good. This site, nor the neighborhood cannot sustain 2 enterprises on one site. I do hope the private options come through. We need our parks just as much as we need our schools.
Dave
5:00 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
Obviously, not everyone agrees with your opinion that the site and neighborhood cannot support a school. It continues to be stated as if it's an immutable fact, despite all of the evidence to the contrary. My guess is that any costs to purchase a large, suitable private parcel in the BCC Cluster will far outweigh any costs incurred to handle the topography in RCH Park. I think it's time RCH started to embrace the idea of the new school and recognize all of the good that can come from it.
Mr. Ed
2:59 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
I am so thankful that this second committee has validated the selection of the first committee. Now maybe we can put this while thing behind us and get the school built!
lena
1:15 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012
I am not sure that the process was as thorough as it should have been. My impression was the private sites had been eliminated, are they still under consideration?
Laura L Thornton
6:53 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012
As I understood it from the meeting, the site selection committee makes recommendations, not the final decision. Also, committee members are submitting comments about the sites for a draft report, and can include comments on the private sites as well as the public ones.
Jack
4:13 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012
I'm not sure I understand the following sentence:
Many residents commented on the fact that siting a school in Rock Creek Hills Park—on the eastern end of the cluster in Kensington—could result in a less-diverse student body both at the new school and at Westland Middle School, which is currently the only middle school in the Bethesda-Chevy Chase cluster.
Am I missing something? How could both schools become less diverse?
Laura L Thornton
4:24 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012
Hi Jack,
With two middle schools—one in the western part of the cluster and one in the eastern part of the cluster—and with the eastern part of the cluster having more minority students—some folks are concerned that the two schools would not be as racially diverse as Westland currently is (however crowded it may be). The argument has already been brought up regarding the cluster's elementary schools (http://bethesda.patch.com/articles/board-of-education-approves-starr-s-b-cc-boundary-plan).
-Laura
Laura L Thornton
6:56 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012
The concern is that, while the new middle school could be more diverse than Westland currently is now, Westland could become less diverse than it currently is now.
Mr. Ed
8:18 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
so we should not build a school and continue to bus kids for 45 minutes each way to achieve diversity? I thought that strategy was discredited in the 1970's. Are the folks in RCH against a racially diverse school in their neighborhood? I don't think so.
I hate to ask this, but are you saying that we bus kids in opposite directions to achieve racial diversity, rather than look at the geographic location of the population. Since westland is at the western end of the cluster. any school located east and north of it would require westland to become less racially diverse, pretty much no matter where the school is located, whether RCH or any of the other sites judged by two selection committees to be less desirable than RCH. is my logic flawed here?
Laura L Thornton
9:13 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
Hi Mr. Ed,
I'm not actually taking one side or the other here, but just reporting on the concerns that I've heard folks express. So, I guess you're question is better directed to someone else. I'll ask around.
It's a good question - thanks!
-Laura
Jerry
1:03 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
This reads like a compelling case of NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard), and not without justification. The truth is, Montgomery County treats public schools as sacred cows like Motherhood and Apple Pie. In fact, they are a nuisance to adjacent property owners, with respect to noise, traffic, litter, parking vehicles on private property, and trespassing. Yet these adjacent property owners are assessed the same exorbitant property taxes as nonadjacent owners, ironically, mostly to fund these public schools. The compelling logic is to give these unfortunate homeowners a substantial tax break for putting up with the nuisance of a public facility next door.