patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Poll: Does the Internet Ruin the Olympics?

NBC is getting flack from Americans who don't want to wait for the prime time broadcasts, and from those whose surprise was spoiled online.

 

Despite record ratings in the first days of the Olympics, NBC is facing criticism for its insistence on delaying the broadcasts of the most popular events in order to attract primetime audiences in the United States.

According to news reports, 28.7 million viewers tuned in to NBC Saturday night for the first night of competition, beating the record set for the Atlanta Olympics in 1996.

But with Michael Phelps on the hunt for a swimming medal record and Lebron James hoping to resurrect the basketball "Dream Team" of the past, websites—including NBC's Olympics website—are letting the cat out of the bag before Americans have a chance to watch the competitions on television.

By 2:30 p.m. EDT on Saturday, the men's 400-meter individual medley—the first event for Phelps—had concluded, and fans on the East Coast had to avoid revealing headlines online for nearly six hours until they could watch on television as the American superstar failed to place.

With up-to-the-minute Internet coverage, the cartoon above, from the 1936 competitions in Berlin, seems eerily accurate as runners take off from the starting line to an audience of one camera and the amplified cheers of viewers at their home televisions.

Alexandra Petri, a columnist for The Washington Post, says, tongue-in-cheek, that watching the Olympics on NBC is like stepping into a time machine, going back to a time before websites, social media and a 24-hour news cycle.

Here are a few tweets from NBC Live Fail, an account making fun of NBC's tape delays:

"HAPPENING NOW ON NBC - Verdict expected any minute in OJ Simpson trial. Stay tuned for developing story. #NBCFail"

"BREAKING - Jesse Owens wins gold in 100m sprint #NBCFail"

"Mitt Romney will release his tax returns but NBC will not broadcast them until this December #NBCfail #p2 #tcot"

Another Twitter account, called Fake NBC Exec, chimed in:

"Make sure you tune in tonight so you can watch all the events our app pushed to you this afternoon #NBCfail"

With audience numbers in the range of 28.7 million a night, people are either holding back on viewing during the day by choice, or simply don't mind watching the events streamed online and again during the national broadcast.

Do you think the Internet is ruining Olympics coverage? Vote in our poll below, or share your opinion in the comments.

  • Does the Internet ruin traditional television coverage of the Olympics?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • 1. Yes, I would like to watch the results on television as God intended.
        3 (17%)
    • 2. How could a record amount of Olympics coverage ruin Olympics coverage?
        3 (17%)
    • 3. I don't have a hard time avoiding Olympic spoilers.
        1 (5%)
    • 4. NBC would be wise to run a television broadcast live and in primetime.
        10 (58%)
    Total votes: 17
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: #NBCfail, London Olympics 2012, Olympic audience, and Olympics

Katie Griffith

2:22 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

I'm not particularly bothered by the coverage. I don't mind knowing the outcome of Olympic events, especially since I can watch the excitement later. It's still fun to watch great athletes show off.

Reply

Pamela Torro

3:20 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

I have been trying to avoid as I would like to be surprised. I appreciate how NBC4 sent an email asking if we would like updates whereas WSJ and ABC7 just send an email as they would with any other breaking news.

Reply

Michael J. Colella

6:38 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Agree, We could do without the "Breaking News" of Olympic wins or loses.

Reply

Kurt Zimmermann

9:23 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

I mostly avoid 'push' news. I don't like the intrusiveness and I seldom actually NEED to know what is being thrown at me. (airline gate changes and the like are exceptions, of course).

That said, this whole construct of scheduled, time-slotted TV programming is an anachronism. I already watch most of my Olympics coverage off of what I've recorded on DVR. In effect, I'm watching NBC's delayed coverage on my own delay. A la carte TV is coming -- whether or not incumbent networks like NBC embrace it or not. And by "TV", what I really mean is video content, as the TV screen itself is not a requirement either.

Reply

Arlene K. Polangin

1:38 pm on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

I have both good and bad comments. If I'll be away, I enjoy getting the event coverage on NBC news. If not, I prefer it without knowing ahead of time. What I really find annoying is some of the ridiculous comments made by Matt Lauer and others. I don't need their dumb "filler" comments. It's better to watch with the MUTE button pressed!

Reply

Leave a comment