Business & Tech

Acela, Northeast Regional Ridership Skyrockets

Have you noticed an increase in ridership when taking Amtrak?

Have you noticed the lines at Union Station for the Acela and Northeast Regional trains to New York City are getting longer?

If so, you're not imagining things.

According to a Brookings Institution report, Amtrak ridership has grown by 55 percent since 1997, and most of this increase has been based in short-distance routes (less than 400 miles). Eighty-three percent of all Amtrak ridership in 2012 was via short-distance routes.

Interested in local real estate?Subscribe to Patch's new newsletter to be the first to know about open houses, new listings and more.

The two most popular routes in the Northeast Corridor are the Acela and the Northeast Regional, both of which make stops at Union Station in Washington, DC; Penn Station in New York City; and South Station in Boston (with other station stops in-between).

The Acela had 3.395 million riders in 2012 while the Northeast Regional, which makes more stops and costs less (but takes longer), had more than 8 million riders. That’s an increase of 1 million riders in 15 years for the Northeast Regional (the Acela did not exist in 1997), according to the report.

Interested in local real estate?Subscribe to Patch's new newsletter to be the first to know about open houses, new listings and more.

“Those two routes generated a net operating balance of $205.4 million in 2011, with $178.8 million derived from Acela operations alone. This is not a new phenomenon as over the five fiscal years ending in 2011, these two Northeast Corridor routes delivered an average positive balance of $135.9 million per year. They also generated this return via their own operations—the two routes received essentially no state funding support for operations during those five years,” according to the report.

“However, since Amtrak owns most of the track in the Northeast Corridor and must maintain the tracks for its own services plus regional freight and commuter functions, it incurs higher long-term depreciation costs not included in these operating statistics,” reported the Brookings Institution.

Adie Tomer, associate fellow at the Brookings Institution and one of the authors of the report, told The Boston Globe:

“If you’re close to another big metropolitan market and the train runs frequently, people are going to take it,” Tomer said. “When distances extend past about 400 miles, any individual is going to think long and hard about taking a flight, for time considerations alone.”

Do you take the Acela or Northeast Regional trains to New York City on a frequent basis? Which train do you prefer? Have you seen increases in the numbers of people riding them? Tell us in the comments.


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here